since i grew up in illinois, about 20 miles south of springfield, a town called kincaid, illinois. when i lived in chicago from 84-80, that candidates me a little bit come but i used to take the train from chicago to springfield to my parents would pick me up because i didn't have a car. i'm going to address this question to you. when we talk about high-speed rail, we are talking about maximum speed, you know, some point along the track, 110 miles per hour. but the question i have is, average speed and time savings going different distances. for example, going from chicago to springfield. i can't recall exactly but we had a couple other stops in suburban chicago, and i think joliet and normal and other places. so investments come and ms. hammond i'll ask you about this, investment in increasing our top speed to 110 miles an hour could cost us quite a bit of money. but when you start looking at average speed and then you start excluding communities that love access to a train, because you're going to go from chicago to st. louis, you're going to have a high speed train. i get back.